[Advaita-l] In Our Advait Vedant Tradition what Rigved 6.61.3 instructs.

[सर्वभूतहिते स्मार्त्त कुवँर बिपिन चौहान]

हार्दिक धन्यवाद मार्गदशर्न हेतु।

हमारी अद्वैत परम्परा में इसका श्रुति सम्मत आदेश या दिशा निर्देश प्रकट करें।



---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <jaldhar at braincells.com>
Date: Wed, 8 May, 2024, 02:00
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] In Our Advait Vedant Tradition what Rigved 6.61.3
instructs.
To: ravi chandrasekhara <vadhula at yahoo.com>
Cc: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>, कुवँर बिपिन चौहान <
bipinchauhan7 at gmail.com>, korada11 at gmail.com <korada11 at gmail.com>


On Sat, 4 May 2024, ravi chandrasekhara wrote:

> Are the punishments for Deva ninda just artha vaada ?
> Rather than state sponsored punishments. But punishment meted out in para
> loka
>
> eg, in Islamic nations, blasphemy is a punishable by offense by law.
>

Not arthavada but the state has always been very decentralized in Bharata.
The primary social unit is the jati and for most offenses would have been
dealt with by the elders with fines, fasts or in the worst cases
outcasting of the offender.  It is only if they were unable to adjudicate
would formal law enforcemnt get involved.

My great-great-grandfather was the kings representative (rajadhyaksha) of
the local raja in our ancestral village.  Jadeja Rajputs are the dominant
caste there and their panchayata chose the sarpanch (mayor) and ran
things.  The rajadhyakshas only real duties were to organize and preside
over certain observances in lieu of the king and assess and collect taxes.
Only If there was an inter-caste dispute that couldn't be resolved locally
or a particularly heinous crime such as murder he would have to intervene
and take the parties to town to be judged by the royal court.  Also
certain Rajputs known as Darbaris had the right to attend court and make
their own pleas bypassing him altogether.  The royal courts if they had
distinguished scholars (which in Gujarat quite frankly most did not)
probably did consult dharmashastras ad hoc for guidance on punishments but
not on a rigid legalistic basis.  There wasn't a formal equivalent to
sharia but that doesn't mean the concept of "blasphemy" didn't exist and
wasn't punished.

--
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: कुवँर बिपिन चौहान <bipinchauhan7 at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr, 2024, 13:00
Subject: In Our Advait Vedant Tradition what Rigved 6.61.3 instructs.
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Cc: <korada11 at gmail.com>, <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>


कृपया मार्गदर्शन करें कि Advait परम्परा/सम्प्रदाय में ऋग्वेद 6.61.3 मंत्र
का अर्थ क्या कहता है।
वर्तमान में ३ भिन्न अर्थ बौद्धिक कर रहे हैं। १
https://twitter.com/TrueIndology/status/1782429429592936924
https://twitter.com/TrueIndology/status/1782402290227331264 (attached
1,1a,1b,1c) २ https://twitter.com/subhra2jyoti/status/1335894153889103874
https://twitter.com/subhra2jyoti/status/1335894340309139456 (attached 2) ३
https://www.wisdomlib.org/hinduism/book/rig-veda-english-translation/d/doc834375.html
(attached 3) To view attachments click on link
<https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1kPeETtqtYD5WNaKLGm4lQqj8QYdDqBmM?usp=sharing>
मार्गदर्शन
कर, #सत्य
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%A4%E0%A5%8D%E0%A4%AF?src=hashtag_click>
बोध कराएँ। [image: 🙏🏻]


https:// <https://twitter.com/TrueIndology/status/1782429429592936924>