[Advaita-l] [advaitin] request for PTB support for DSV and EJV

[Michael Chandra Cohen]

namaste Subbuji,
isn't vishayi namarupa? why would there be sunya is namarupa is dispelled
and nitya-shuddha-buddha-mukta-svarupa re-mains? vishaya/vishayi are
correlative terms, and if the object (vishaya) is negated, the subject
(vishayi) must also be negated <AI finished this sentence for me
unrequested - even AI knows the truth of that last sentence :) >

Chat can be long winded. All is agreed in your Chat response. The challenge
is that a bhavarupa avidya isn't subject to falsification by knowledge -
only an error can be falsified - therefore, it doesn't work as a
provisional teaching. That is SSS's reasoning..

I'd like to propose an experiment: would you copy my last response into
your chat and request a refutation? Given our discussion about how AI
responses can be shaped by user framing, I'm curious to see what
alternative perspective it might offer.
Regards, michael

On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 5:19 AM Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste Raghav ji.
>
>
>> The merger of prANa (and everything else)  in sushupti is accepted by even
>>  SSSS. (Notwithstanding the fact that it’s sabīja and not  nirbīja as per
>>  mainstream Vedanta.
>>
>> If the “merger of prANa” is the distinctive characteristic of DSV, we have
>>  to say SSSS unwittingly accepts DSV !)
>>
>
> I find SSSS ji to self-contradict himself. So, it is no surprise.
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "advaitin" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to advaitin+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBA5jJmVC0%2BcF_SEhD-TvVu0YWo_NFNk8fWcvPZ9zfxOxg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBA5jJmVC0%2BcF_SEhD-TvVu0YWo_NFNk8fWcvPZ9zfxOxg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>