[Advaita-l] Fwd: Rama and Krishna are Jiva-s - Mahabharata
Kalyan
kalyan_kg at yahoo.com
Wed May 24 12:46:38 EDT 2017
If Shankara has accepted the Buddha's views on dispassion (apart from acknowledging the closeness of his school with Buddhism) then it is even more surprising that he passes these unflattering comments on Buddhism -
http://www.sacred-texts.com/hin/sbe34/sbe34208.htm
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 5/24/17, V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Fwd: Rama and Krishna are Jiva-s - Mahabharata
To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>, "Kalyan" <kalyan_kg at yahoo.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2017, 1:14 PM
On 24 May 2017 17:33,
"Kalyan via Advaita-l" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
wrote:
//The
criticism of these other schools centers around the fact
that none of them are independent means to moksha. The same
Sankara also accepts whatever is right and good in these
other schools, subject to agreement with the aupanishada
teachings.//
Once again, reality is different from the above. In BSB
2.2.32, Shankara summarily dismisses the entire Bauddha
school. He further says that either the Buddha is a man who
makes incoherent assertions or has hatred for all beings.
Shankara has no objection to the Buddha's
views about dispassion. He has expressly stated
that.
This,
despite the fact that Shankara himself acknowledges the
closeness of his school with that of the Buddhists in his
Mandukya karika bhashya!
Closeness does not mean camaraderie. For that
matter even the Sankhya is very close to
Advaita.
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 4:13 PM, Vidyasankar
Sundaresan <svidyasankar at gmail.com>
wrote:
The criticism of these other schools centers around the
fact that none of them are independent means to moksha.
This is the central point that has to be
grasped.
VS
The same Sankara also
accepts whatever is right and good in these other schools,
subject to agreement with the aupanishada teachings.
SrutyanusAra-ananusAra vishaya-vivecanena sanmArge prajnA
sangrahaNIyA, and paramatam apratishiddham anumataM bhavati,
he says.
In contrast, bhakti towards a particular form of ISvara is a
key step in the jnAnamArga of advaita vedAnta, provided
people don't get caught up in the ridiculous my God is
better than your God attitude. Unfortunately, this is a trap
that many vaishNavas and Saivas find very difficult to
avoid.
Once again, rather than get caught up in superficialities,
please pay attention to the details. There is a huge amount
of material in our own list archives as a starting point.
That is, if one can put resentment aside and read with an
open mind.
Vidyasankar
On May 24, 2017 4:49 AM, "Kalyan via Advaita-l"
<advaita-l at lists.advaita-
vedanta.org> wrote:
//Here lies the greatness of we advaitins that we never
criticise any path and take everyone in our own stride and
move on....//
Sri Venkata Sriram, Shankara has criticized mimamsa, nyaya,
samkhya, yoga, vaiseshika, bauddha, jaina, pashupata,
pancaratra, carvaka philosophers in his commentaries. To say
that advaitins do not criticize anybody is far removed from
reality.
RegardsKalyan
On
Wednesday, May 24, 2017 1:28 PM, Venkata sriram P via
Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita- vedanta.org> wrote:
Namaste,
////
Appayya Dikshitha probably has not studied the entire
Mahabharata.
In Shanti parvan, when Vishnu shows his Vishwaroopa to
Narada
///
Those who are making furore over the मन्दत्व
of अप्पय दीक्षितः, why don't
they raise
objections to the remark of वेदान्त
देशिकः when he makes a remark against
दक्षिणामुर्तिः
vide shloka no. 7 of his हयग्रीव
स्तोत्रं :
दाक्षिण्यरम्या
गिरिशस्य मूर्तिः देवी
सरोजासन धर्मपत्नी ।
व्यासादयोऽपि
व्यपदेश्यवाचः
स्फुरन्ति सर्वे तव
शक्तिलेशैः ॥ ७॥
"the pretty south-faced Ishwara (dakshinamurti), Devi
Saraswati and Bhagavan Badarayana -
all three draw their power of Knowledge from Lord
Hayagriva"
Granted that these compositions show one's devotion to
personal deity but is it not blasphemous
to say that the Dakshinamurti who taught the essence of
vedanta to great brahmanishtaas thru
silence draws His knowledge thru Hayagriva. The greatness
of dakshinamurti is stated in Bhagavata Purana
itself in 4th chapter. Having seated in 'mahAyOga'
rUpa 'vaTavrikSa', demonstrates the
'chinmudra' and dispels
the doubts to sages.
Now, should we advaitins conclude that Vedanta Desika
didn't study any shastras and was
ignorant of the dakshinamurti-tattva? Certainly not.
Here lies the greatness of we advaitins
that we never criticise any path and take everyone in our
own stride and move on....
Advaitins are broad-minded and that is why it has become
more popular and
more acceptable today by great logicians and
philanthropists.
regs,
sriram
______________________________
_________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.
culture.religion.advaita
To unsubscribe
or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
______________________________
_________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.
culture.religion.advaita
To unsubscribe
or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
______________________________ _________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.
culture.religion.advaita
To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.
org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list