[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

[H S Chandramouli]

In continuation to my earlier post, for the sake of selfcompleteness, the
following correction may please be made.

Against

<< Pratyaksha is not a pramana for Brahman. Only Agama (in the form of
Mahavakyas ) is.>>,

please read as

<< Pratyaksha is not a pramana for Brahman. Only Agama (in the form of
Mahavakyas ) is. But

the Agama pramana does not contradict pratyaksha pramana  >>.

The explanation for this has already been given.

Regards

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:46 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sri Ravi Kiran Ji,
>
>
>
> Reg  <<one is at paramartha and other is vyavaharika ? why compare or
> mention them ? what purpose it achieves or issue it solves ?
>
> how it is useful in the current thread of discussion ?  >>,
>
>
>
> both the pramanas are vyavaharika only. In fact the question  has been put
> forth as a strong argument in favour of the proposition that jagat is
> sathya. But the question itself is invalid due to following reasons.
>
>
>
> Pratyaksha is not a pramana for Brahman. Only Agama (in the form of
> Mahavakyas ) is.
>
>
>
> Mithya does not contradict pratyaksha because part of the definition of
> mithya is that for anything to be considered mithya, it must in the first
> place conform to pratyaksha pramana.
>
>
>
> So where is the contradiction of pramanas??
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>