[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

[Ravi Kiran]

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 8:05 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sri Ravi Kiran Ji,
>
> I was not really addressing your observation. My post was to answer the
> observation made by Sri Bhaskar Ji. My apologies. I should perhaps have
> addressed it in the first place to Sri Bhaskar Ji.
>
> Regards
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:46 PM, H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sri Ravi Kiran Ji,
>>
>>
>>
>> Reg  <<one is at paramartha and other is vyavaharika ? why compare or
>> mention them ? what purpose it achieves or issue it solves ?
>>
>> how it is useful in the current thread of discussion ?  >>,
>>
>>
>>
>> both the pramanas are vyavaharika only. In fact the question  has been
>> put forth as a strong argument in favour of the proposition that jagat is
>> sathya. But the question itself is invalid due to following reasons.
>>
>>
>>
>> Pratyaksha is not a pramana for Brahman.
>>
>

> Only Agama (in the form of Mahavakyas ) is.
>>
>
Very Precise..

>
>>
>> Mithya does not contradict pratyaksha because part of the definition of
>> mithya is that for anything to be considered mithya, it must in the first
>> place conform to pratyaksha pramana.
>>
>>
>>
>> So where is the contradiction of pramanas??
>>
>

Thanks Sri Chandra Mouli Ji

Will let Bhaskar Ji to comment / respond to this thread...



>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>