[Advaita-l] Topic for Discussion: What is Nirvikalpaka Samaadhi?

kuntimaddi sadananda kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com
Thu Mar 10 00:11:28 CST 2016



Sunilji - PraNAms 

What you said is true and that does not negate the shravana, manana and nidhidhyaasana from the jiiva's reference. Even the nirvikalpaka samaadhi  also from jiiva's reference only. Hence what you mentioned still applies, along with what I wrote from the point of jeeva.

Now - regarding the aunupravesha statement. What does entering means? The all-pervading sat chit ananda cannot enter anywhere since it Brahman or infinite. Hence anupravesha really means formation of Chidaabhaasa at the individuals' level by saaskhee. Saakshee is differentiated from Brahaman just as  local sunlight that falls on the moon vs the global sunlight - even though sunlight is undifferentiable. This differentiation is only for the purpose of teaching. 

Formation of chidaabhaasa is there as long as the subtle body is there. Subtle body will be there as long as one has not realized and the BMI drops by videha mukti. 

Hari Om!
Sada



--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 3/10/16, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Topic for Discussion: What is Nirvikalpaka Samaadhi?
 To: "Sunil Bhattacharjya" <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com>, "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>, "kuntimaddi sadananda" <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
 Date: Thursday, March 10, 2016, 12:13 AM
 
 Namaste Sadaji,
 
 Having created whatever is there in the universe  the
 Lord entered into that as Jeeva. Essentially he is the
 consciousness. But as Jeeva he is the rider in the Chariot.
 The Jeeva is sentient and the chariot is insentient, but as
 long as the Jeeva rides  the chariot the Jeeva thinks
 he is inseparable from the chariot. That is why one can
 think of Jeeva with the Chariot also, but not by those who
 want to split hair. Through shastra and Guru he gets the
 knowledge of  the truth and through Manana and Dhyana
 he imbibes that and becomes Jeevanmukta and finally he
 leaves the Chariot (the Koshas) and becomes Videhamukta and
 free. This I think is the entire Advaitic journey in a
 nutshell.  
 
 Regards,
 Sunil
 
 
 --------------------------------------------
 On Wed, 3/9/16, kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
 wrote:
 
  Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Topic for Discussion: What is
 Nirvikalpaka Samaadhi?
  To: "Sunil Bhattacharjya" <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com>,
 "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
  Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016, 7:12 PM
  
  Sunilji - PraNAms
  
  Chitta - word was used in many ways - in Vedanta - it is
  used in the sense of subtle body - that includes four
  components, mind, intellect, memory and ahankaara. It is
  used only to designate the memory part also. Sometime mind
  is used to designate all the four. All are thought process
  and names change depending on the function. Tatva bodha or
  Vivikachudmani describes these - in nirvaana shatakam -
 mano
  buddhi ahankaara chittaani naaham...
  
  All thoughts are inert. Hence inert thing cannot be a
 jeeva.
  Being a subtle material, the pure sat chit ananda can get
  reflected by the subtle body- called chidaabaasa and by
 way
  of reflection of consciousness the subtle body also
 becomes
  conscious entity just as moon by reflection of sunlight
  becomes a luminous body. Reflection of consciousness is
  expression of life itself and jiiva notion arises due to
 not
  knowing that I am is the original consciousness.
  
  Chitta vRitti - when we add vRitti - now we are referring
 to
  not just memory but to the total mind - as the absence of
  vRitti - VRitti as discussed in the article - idam vRitti
  and aham vRtti, etc for external perceptions. For internal
  perceptions such as happy thought or angry or emotional
  thoughts there is no indriya input. 
  
  Hari Om!
  Sada
  
  --------------------------------------------
  On Wed, 3/9/16, Sunil Bhattacharjya via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
  wrote:
  
   Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Topic for Discussion: What
 is
  Nirvikalpaka Samaadhi?
   To: "adviata-l" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>,
  "kuntimaddi sadananda" <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
   Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016, 7:18 PM
   
   Dear Sadaji,
   
   To my understanding the "Chitta" is "Mind", "Ego"
 and
   "Intellec"t together along with the "Impressions or
  Memory".
   and some puranas have called the Chitta itself as
 the
  Jeeva.
   The aim of "Cittavritti-nirodha" in yoga is to
 control the
   fluctuations in the Chitta and that finally comes to
 the
   thought-control in the mind. When the mind is still
 and
   there are no thought appearing in the mind, that 
 helps
   the Chittaa to disconnect from the Prakrti.or Maya
 and one
   becomes "Jivanmukta". Eventually with the leaving of
 the
   five Koshas, the "Videhamukti" is achieved and there
 is
   one-ness with Brahman. 
   
   Regards,
   Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
   
   
   --------------------------------------------
   On Wed, 3/9/16, kuntimaddi sadananda via Advaita-l
 <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
   wrote:
   
    Subject: [Advaita-l] Topic for Discussion: What is
   Nirvikalpaka Samaadhi?
    To: "adviata-l" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
    Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016, 7:57 AM
    
    PraNAms to all
    
    I posed this question in both lists. There were few
  who
    discussed on this topic. I thank all of them who
    participated in the discussion. I am presenting below
  my
    understanding for whatever it is worth.
    
   
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    
    I am providing below my understanding. Some of these
   aspects
    are discussed exhaustively by Shree Vidyaranya swami
  in
    Panchadashi – which we are doing now. We are doing
  now
   the
    10th Chapter. Just of info- The talks on the
  Chapters
    covered so far are available on Yu-tube under
  Acharya
    Sadaji.
    
    Is Self-realization involves objectless-awareness as
  some
    subscribe.
    
    The objectless awareness is nothing but pure sat
  chit
    ananda. It is always there - with the objects at the
  very
    substantive and without the objects as Brahman. It
  is
    paaramaarthika satyam. na vaaak gacchati na manaH -
  no
    speech can go there nor the mind - says the
  scripture.
   yato
    vaacho nivartante apraapya manasaa saha. For pure
  Brahman
   -
    there is no need of self-realization too, as it is
  one
    without a second. Jnaanam and ajnaanam etc., are all
  at
    vyaavhaarika level only. Hence self-realization
  cannot be
    object-less awareness, and one cannot reach there and
  one
    need not reach there too, since it is ever present
  and
    infinite.  
    
    Self-realization is by the mind only - Mind has to
   recognize
    or re-cognize that the existence that supports the
  mind or
    the consciousness that enlivens the mind is due to
  the
   pure
    self that I am; since I say I am existent-conscious
  entity
    – I am, in fact, a self-existent and
  self-conscious
    entity. 
    
     Thoughts or vRittis that arise my mind are also
   objects of
    my awareness. As every thought (either due to
  external
    perceptions or internal perceptions) arises in the
  mind -
   as
    - this is a pot-, or - this is chair, 
  simultaneously
    or spontaneously subject thought - I am - as knower
  arises
    in the mind- Bhagavan Ramana calls this as aham
  vRitti
    centered on the knower, in contrast to idam vRitti
   centered
    in objective-thought. 
    
    Aham vRitit is not objective thought but the -
  knower
    thought, as -I know this is a pot - I know this is a
   chair,
    etc. Thus we have object-thought of idam vRitti as
  in,
   this
    is a pot or this is a chair, etc.; and along with
  this,
    spontaneously a knower thought - I am the knower that
  this
    is a pot, etc ., arises. This aham vRitti is not
  objective
    thought, but subject-or knower vRitti, which also
  owns the
    knowledge as in - I am the knower of this thought. 
    Shifting the mind from the object thought to the
  subject
    vRitti is object-less awareness. It is not
  elimination of
    the thoughts but shifting the mind to the knowing
   principle
    because of which every objective thought is known. I
  am
    neither known or unknown but the very knowing
  principle of
    both known and unknown says kena up. To recognize
  and
   claim
    I am that - without the objective thoughts or more
   correctly
    in spite of objective thoughts - requires a very
    discriminative mind or mind with viveka.  While
    remaining within the upaadhi recognizing I am is the
  pure
    existence-consciousness that enlivens the upAdhi- it
  is
    called upahita chaitanya. To be able to shift my
  mind
    without getting lost in the objective thoughts that
  floods
    the mind, meditation on the single thought – as in
  japa-
    would help or even the meditation on the thought –
  aham
    brahmaasmi – once one has understood the truth –
   brahma
    sayam, jagan mithyaa and aham brahma eva na aparaH
  though
    Vedanta shravana and manana. 
    
    A similar analogy is looking at the moon (which is
   actually
    the presiding deity of the mind) and the moonlight
  and
   claim
    that I am actually seeing the sunlight that is
  illumining
    the moon. I cannot really see the sunlight directly.
  I
   need
    the moon to RECOGNIZE the presence of sunlight. What
  I see
    is only moon-light. I have to use viveka to shift my
    attention from the moon light to that because of moon
  has
    the light.  There is sunlight outside the moon too
  but
    I cannot recognize that since there is no object to
   reflect
    that light. Hence I need the reflecting object and
  from
   the
    reflection recognize cognitively the original light.
    Similarly I cannot see the objectless awareness but I
  have
    to recognize I am in the every objective awareness -
  Hence
    Kenopanishad says- pratibhoda viditam matam - It is
   revealed
    in every thought or experience as the knower or
   experiencer,
    which has to be conscious-existent entity since
   non-existent
    or unconscious entity cannot have any experience. 
    
    The thought-less mind happens normally in deep-sleep
    state.  In the deep-sleep state there is akhanda
    ajnaana vRitti or constant unbroken thought of
  ignorance
   of
    subject-object duality, as the mind is folded. Deep
  sleep
    state is not meditation since mind is folded and
  cannot
    abide in the knowledge of aham brahmaasmi. 
    
    Patanjali yoga talks about the chitta vRitti nirodha
  –
   or
    shutting of all the thoughts – essentially a
  thoughtless
    mind or empty mind. As Swami Dayanandaji puts it –
  an
    ignorant thought full mind has now become ignorant
    thoughtless mind. The ignorance remains. When the
  mind
    awakens with thoughts you are back to square one and
    Patanjali yoga advocates dvaita only and not
  advaita.
   Hence
    no knowledge of advaita occurs in that thoughtless
  mind. 
    
    Nirvikalpaka samaadhi:
    
    Nirvikalpaka samaadhi is described for the one who
  has
    studied Vedanta under a sampradaaya teacher and the
  mind
   has
    grasped truth – aham brahmaasmi. Hence it is not a
    substitute for the knowledge since muula avidya or
   ignorance
    of the self can only by knowledge of the self –
  via
    Vedanta pramaana. Even after gaining the knowledge,
  if
   such
    a mind is not able to abide in that knowledge of
  aham
    brahmaasmi due to remnant raaga-dweshaas, one can
  meditate
    on the knowledge – aham brahmaasmi as the single
  thought
    without any other thoughts in the mind. That is
   nirvikalpaka
    samAdhI with the knowledge of aham brahamsmi single
   thought.
    Thus one slowly eliminates the remnant raaga dweshas
  and
    such a person even if he comes out of that
  meditation, the
    knowledge remains with him – now even with the
  thoughts
    – since he has understood that He is pure sat chit
   ananda
    and presence or absence of thoughts do not affect
  him
   since
    they are mithyaa. 
    
    Hence what is needed is a) clear understanding of
  the
   truth
    – brahma satyam, jagan mithyaa and aham brahmaasmi
  –
    that involves a) paroksha jnaanam of the jagat and
  Iswara
    and b) aparoksha jnanam via mahaavaakya vichaara.
  –
   There
    are no short cuts here. Nidhidhyaasana is required
  for
    madhyama adhikaari who is not able to abide in the
   knowledge
    – aham brahmaasmi. For him, constant enquiry is the
  best
    approach, so that the mind does not get entangled
  with the
    day to day life in vyavahaara, which he cannot but
  do, as
    long as BMI is there. If he cannot enquire or do
  vichaara
    – then one can do meditation on aham brahmaasmi
  with the
    background knowledge via mahaavaakyaas.  
    
    If absence of thoughts is required for
  self-realization,
    then we are giving more reality to the thoughts or as
  much
    reality to the thoughts as the self. Ontologically
  Self or
    Brahman is of higher order of reality and thoughts
  cannot
    replace Brahman or the self for me to remove the
  thoughts
   to
    recognize the self. What is required is detachment of
  the
    mind from the thoughts (as they involve ahankaara
  and
    mamakaara due to raaga and dweshas – I-ness and
  my-ness
    due to likes and dislikes) so that mind can shift
  its
    attention to aham vRitti from idam vRitti.  
    
    Some can even experience a thought-less state or
    nirvikalpaka samAdhI. However without Vedanta
  knowledge
   such
    an experience is neither needed nor necessary. What
  is
    required is clear understand of the truth – Brahma
   satyam,
    jagan mithyaa, aham brahmaasmi – knowledge –
  though
    Vedanta mahaavaakya vichaara, via shravana and
  manana.
    Meditation or even nirvikalpaka samAdhI is not a
  pramaana
   or
    means of knowledge – one can have experience but
  such an
    experience is not needed for self-knowledge.
  Meditation or
    continuous enquiry is required for the mind to abide
  in
   the
    knowledge gained via shravana and manana – that is
    listening to the sampradaaya teacher on Vedanta for
    prolonged length of time until the knowledge is
  crytal
   clear
    and doubt-free. Even after gaining the knowledge, one
  is
    unable abide in the knowledge for them
  nidhidhyaasana
    including nirvikalpaka samadhi is recommended. The
  later
    ones are not alternatives to Vedanta shravana and
  manana. 
    
    Hope this helps. 
    
    I want to thank all those who presented their view.
    
    Hari Om!
    Sada
    _______________________________________________
    Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
    http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
    
    To unsubscribe or change your options:
    http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
    
    For assistance, contact:
    listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
   _______________________________________________
   Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
   http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
   
   To unsubscribe or change your options:
   http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
   
   For assistance, contact:
   listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list