[Advaita-l] A request for clarifications

[Vikram Jagannathan]

Namaskaram Santosh ji,

Adding to what other esteemed members have said -

In brief, the traditional study of the Vedas and Vedānta has certain
prerequisites, including vyākaraṇa, tarka-śāstra, dharma-śāstra, and
related disciplines. Without some grounding in these prerequisites, a
student may not be adequately prepared to study the Vedas or Vedānta
effectively. This is similar to how the study of quantum mechanics
presupposes prior knowledge of algebra, trigonometry, and calculus.

Therefore, the question is not a simple binary one. It also involves the
student’s time, effort, attitude, discipline, and willingness to undertake
the necessary preparation.

That said, I would first like to understand the main concern from your
son’s perspective. Is he concerned that:
a. Women and śūdras are unable to receive knowledge and guidance regarding
the karma, upāsanā, and jñāna sections?
b. Women and śūdras are unable to independently own or lead the performance
of specific actions connected with the karma, upāsanā, and jñāna sections?
c. Such injunctions imply a lack of social equality and therefore encourage
inequality or division within society?
d. Women and śūdras are considered ineligible for the highest goal, namely
mokṣa or Bhagavān’s grace?

If the concern is a), then the traditional position is not that women and
śūdras are left without guidance. Rather, guidance appropriate to their
roles, responsibilities, and adhikāra is provided through knowledgeable
members of the tradition. This is somewhat comparable to how we rely on
doctors, lawyers, teachers, and other qualified persons for specialized
guidance in their respective domains.

If b), then again, the traditional framework distinguishes between
receiving guidance, performing one’s own duties, and taking ownership of
specific ritual or scriptural functions. Certain roles may require specific
qualifications, training, and authorization. For tasks that properly belong
to women and śūdras within their own dharma, the appropriate guidance is
given. For other tasks, the relevant adhikārins are identified according to
the śāstric framework.

If c), this needs careful reframing. Equality does not necessarily mean
that every person must be permitted to perform every function irrespective
of preparation, qualification, or role. A random person cannot perform
surgery merely in the name of equality; one must have the necessary
training and authorization. Similarly, the traditional view is based on
adhikāra, responsibility, and fitness for a given function. True equality,
in this sense, means respect for every person’s dignity, responsibilities,
and importance as an integral member of society. Inequality, hatred, or
contempt toward any group would be a misunderstanding or misuse of the
social order, not its proper spirit.

If d), then this is the key point. Swami Śaṅkarācārya clearly identifies
the adhikārī for jñāna-mārga as one who possesses sādhana-catuṣṭaya, the
fourfold qualification. Therefore, women and śūdras who possess these
qualifications are eligible for brahma-jijñāsā. There is no absolute bar to
mokṣa or Bhagavān’s grace. The development of sādhana-catuṣṭaya does not
depend exclusively on formal Vedic study. It can also be cultivated through
Purāṇas, Itihāsas, bhakti, dharma, satsanga, guru-upadeśa, and a life of
inner refinement. Ultimately, what is required is a Guru, the Guru’s grace,
inner maturity, and sincere readiness. In this ultimate sense, mokṣa is not
denied to women or śūdras.

There is also another perspective offered by great modern mahātmās such as
Swami Chinmayananda ji. They explain that the categorization of “women” and
“śūdras” in certain contexts may also be understood not merely in terms of
physical gender or birth, but in terms of mental and intellectual
disposition, maturity, and readiness. For example, Swamiji’s commentary on
the opening verses of Vivekacūḍāmaṇi clarifies this point. In light of this
perspective, the traditional injunctions can be understood more carefully.
They are not meant to deny spiritual worth or the possibility of mokṣa to
anyone. Rather, they operate within a framework of adhikāra, preparation,
responsibility, and guided progression. The highest spiritual goal remains
open to all who have the required inner maturity and who receive the grace
of Guru and Bhagavān.

prostrations,
Vikram

On Fri, Apr 24, 2026 at 11:50 AM santosh mahapatra via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Esteemed Members,
> Please accept my humble Pranams. For past several months I am going
> through an internal turmoil due to my inability to answer some questions
> raised by my 18 year old son regarding Adi Shankar's remarks prohibiting
> studies of Vedas and Vedanta by Women and Shudras.Can there be any
> spiritual interpretation to Adi Shankaracharya's such injunctions? I shall
> appreciate the responses from the learned members in this group. They will
> be very helpful to clarify his doubts.
> Pranams,
> Santosh
>  "Ego rules the world. People are helpless victims of their egos."-- Amma
> (Mata Amritanandamayi Devi, The Hugging Saint)
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>