[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Re: avidyA is adhyasta (superimposed) in AtmA

[Bhaskar YR]

praNAms
Hare Krishna

//I is quite stubbornness to find the kAraNa for the adhyAsa.//

//What is the cause of adhyAsa?? Obviously, it is the abhAva of the vidyA.//

So, notwithstanding the imputation of stubbornness, you have explained abhAva to be the cause of adhyAsa!! Interesting!!!


Ø     First one is said to emphasize the stand of bhAshyakAra, second one is to appease the thirst of the people who want to see everything in the prism of kArya-kAraNa vAda 😊



Be that as it may, let us see whether your claim of vidyA-abhAva as cause of adhyAsa is in accordance with BhAshya!


Ø     Look at your experience before playing anything with bhAshya :  what would be the reason behind seeing the snake instead of rope??  Is it not lack of knowledge of an existing thing and seeing one thing for another??

Now, this claim of yours positing abhAva as a cause is evidently negated by BhAshyakAra as below:

निर्विशेषस्य त्वभावस्य कारणत्वाभ्युपगमे शशविषाणादिभ्योऽप्यङ्कुरादयो जायेरन्; न चैवं दृश्यते ।

नाप्यभावः कस्यचिदुत्पत्तिहेतुः स्यात् , अभावत्वादेव, शशविषाणादिवत् ।

(BSB 2.2.26)

When BhAshyakAra has in so many words emphatically rejected any possibility of abhAva as hetu, to hold that jnAna-abhAva is "obviously" the cause of adhyAsa is naturally incorrect. Isn't it?


  *   Perhaps you might be sitting in your personal library and picking the totally irrelevant quotes like this to prove your theory.  Anyway let me check this adhikaraNa purport and come back to you.  I reckon like ghata bhAshya which you have quoted to prove even abhAva is also bhAva completely out of context, this one too in all probability of the same order.  By the way you advocate the jagat bhrAnti vAda, how do you reconcile your theory with that of above quote??  By the way, when we say abhAva is the cause it does not mean jnAnAbhAva giving the birth to adhyAsa and for the adhyAsa, jnAnAbhAva is the upAdAna.  In short, the ignorance of the jeeva about himself ( the lack of knowledge about himself) is called avidyA, ajnAna, aviveka etc.  This not knowing is ekarUpa and no need to cut this abhAva into somany pieces to query whether it is  prAgabhAva, pradvamsAbhAva, anyonyAbhAva, atyanta abhAva etc. etc. when it comes to svarUpa ajnAna it is simply ‘not knowing’ without any prefixes and suffixes. In this sense it is ekarUpa ( na cha avidyA kevala vaishamyasya kAraNam ekarUpatvAt)  Why is it ekarUpa?’ because, it is the absence of the knowledge which cannot be different in different jeeva-s.  This avidyA makes room for wrong understanding.  Lack of rajju jnAna leads to sarpAvalOkana (lack of svarUpa jnAna leads to dehAtmabhAva) and this is anartha hetu emphasizes bhAshyakAra.



  *   And now to your pet question : how logical it is to say from abhAva there is bhAva?? In other words, if avidyA is non-existent in the form of jnAnAbhAva, how can it give birth or can be a cause to adhyAsa,  which is an actually existent and experiencing one ? To answer this I say : we will have to first understand that when we say jnAnAbhAva type of avidyA is the cause of adhyAsa, it is not in the sense of upAdAna or nimitta like what you (mUlAvidyAvAdins) do : it only gives room for adhyAsa, it is just an excuse, in a pretext.  Like for an example, an empty space covered by cobwebs.  Here available empty space neither upAdAna nor nimitta for cobwebs.  Likewise lack of svarUpa jnAna gives room for misconception but this lack of knowledge neither material nor efficient cause for the vipareeta pratyaya.  Enough said on this.

And hence, all the rest of your write-up is in contradiction to the BhAshya and is accordingly summarily rejected.


Ø     Its all depend on how judiciously you pick these quotes, is it not?? 😊

If you wish point-wise rebuttal, please repudiate the argument adduced by BhAshyakAra precluding the possibility of abhAva as a cause.


Ø     See above, I think I have already said the same thing in another thread as well.  How the pratiyOgi vidya that I am brahman which removes the avidyA.

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar