[Advaita-l] Confusion regarding Shvetashvtara upanishad bhasya

[Hari R]

As per my study, the bhashya to the initial few chapters indicate signs of
manipulation by other hands. At times very long quotations from various
secondary texts, some untraceable now, is given. Leaving that aside, I find
the bhashya to the middle and later chapters of the text quite genuine, and
in perfect accordance to his usual style.

On Tue, 21 Jan, 2025, 10:54 am Bhaskar YR via Advaita-l, <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Traditionally this Upanishad Bhashya is not considered an authentic work
> of Shankaracharya.  Hence, it is not a part of the study of the Prasthana
> Traya Bhashya.
>
> praNAms
> Hare Krishna
>
> Any specific reason / justification for this from traditional scholars??
> Anywhere it is discussed why it is not from the pen of prasthAna traya
> bhAshyakAra??
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>