[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Kilogram concluded

Bhaskar YR bhaskar.yr at hitachienergy.com
Thu Sep 5 04:39:41 EDT 2024


Thus, as per AchArya, avidyA (which is also stated as mUlAvidyA) is different from these avidyA-traya.

praNAms
Hare Krishna

Would like to hear Sri VenkatrAghavan prabhuji’s views on this.  Very often, whenever I say MV is something fourth type which has been advocated by vyAkhyAnakAra-s,  he used to wonder what is this fourth type which is not popularly known as three aspects of avidyA 😊

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar

BHASKAR YR

From: advaitin at googlegroups.com <advaitin at googlegroups.com> On Behalf Of Sudhanshu Shekhar
Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2024 1:20 PM
To: advaitin at googlegroups.com; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Subject: Re: [advaitin] Kilogram concluded

Warning

This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments.
If this email looks suspicious, report it by clicking 'Report Phishing' button in Outlook.
See the SecureWay group in Yammer for more security information.
Hari Om Bhaskar ji.

// is this mUlAvidyA is something like one of the three aspects of avidyA ??//

No. The three are effects of avidyA. The three are incapable of veiling Chaitanya. Only avidyA is capable of veiling Atman.

//or something different to all these three types of avidyA??//

Yes.

/Is this mUlAvidyA -agrahaNa??  Is this MV – vipareeta grahaNa??  Or is this MV is saMshaya, if this strange MV neither of these three and something different and sitting aloof from all these three and acting as upAdAna kAraNa to one of the aspects of avidyA i.e. adhyAsa, then what exactly is this MV??/

It is defined as an entity which is anAdi, bhAvarUpa (bhAva-abhAva-vilakshaNa) and removable-by-jnAna. It is different from these three. It is upAdAna kAraNa of these three. [अनादिभावरूपं यद्विज्ञानेन विलीयते । तदज्ञानमिति प्राज्ञा लक्षणं संप्रचक्षते ॥]

For example, suppose someone blindfolds me. Then, I cannot perceive things kept before me. (agrahNa). This does not mean that the blindfold, the veil, is the same as me not perceiving the objects before me. Isn't it?

So, mUlAvidyA is like that blindfold, which is capable of veiling Brahman. The three agrahNa, mithyA-jnAna, viparIta-grahaNa and samshaya, arise on account of it.

If you see the bhAshya, it says -  तामसे च आवरणात्मके तिमिरादिदोषे सति अग्रहणादेः अविद्यात्रयस्य उपलब्धेः ॥ It makes a distinction between avidyA-traya and the AvaraNAtmaka-dosha, in whose presence, these avidyA-traya manifest. It shows the distinction of the veil with respect to avidyA-traya.

BhAshyakAra further says - तथा सर्वत्रैव अग्रहणविपरीतसंशयप्रत्ययास्तन्निमित्ताः करणस्यैव कस्यचित् भवितुमर्हन्ति, न ज्ञातुः क्षेत्रज्ञस्य ।  Here also, I would draw your attention to the word तन्निमित्ताः in addition to अग्रहणविपरीतसंशयप्रत्यया. It clearly shows that BhAshyakAra has in His mind not only the avidyA-traya, but also their-nimitta, which is AvaraNAtmaka.

Thus, as per AchArya, avidyA (which is also stated as mUlAvidyA) is different from these avidyA-traya.

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.





On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 12:36 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com<mailto:sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hari Om Bhaskar prabhuji.

//So, if you prabhuji-s agreeing that mulAvidyA is kevala adhyasta/superimposed/imagined, I think the Sri SSS’s camp does not have any problem in accepting this type of mUlAvidyA 😊 But I don’t think matter is as simple as this in vyAkhyAnakAra-s camp.//

But whence is this doubt that mUlAvidyA is not adhyasta? This is a well-accepted principle.

SSSS ji says //But if anyone comes up with the theories like : it is not adhyasta (superimposed) or not avidyAkalpita (kalpita-imagined, misconception due to ignorance etc. then I would never accept such stand as that stand is shruti, yukti and bhAshya viruddha//

But who has come up with this theory!! Can even a single statement to that effect be provided which says that mUlAvidyA is not adhyasta?

Regards.
Sudhanshu Shekhar.


--
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax,
Pune

sudhanshushekhar.wordpress.com<http://sudhanshushekhar.wordpress.com/>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "advaitin" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to advaitin+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com<mailto:advaitin+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com>.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBDYb0U7g4fUs_gf2xLu765Fem2xRRZDZ%3DBZ8cn_Wau7Dw%40mail.gmail.com<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/CAH9%3D%2BBDYb0U7g4fUs_gf2xLu765Fem2xRRZDZ%3DBZ8cn_Wau7Dw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list