[Advaita-l] anumAna-pramANa

Raghav Kumar Dwivedula raghavkumar00 at gmail.com
Mon Oct 21 03:08:59 EDT 2024


On Mon, 21 Oct, 2024, 11:51 am Sudhanshu Shekhar via Advaita-l, <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Namaste Chandramouli ji.
>
> //In the illustration under consideration, this translates to अग्नि (agni).
> Thus अग्नि (agni) is the anumiti-karaNa. It is not as if this is not at all
> present. Smoke is pervaded by agni through and through.//
>
> As per VedAnta ParibhAshA, it is the vyApti-jnAna which is anumiti-karaNa.
> agni is not jnAna. It is a vastu. agni is the vishaya of anumiti-jnAna. By
> no logic can a vastu agni be stated as vyApti-jnAna i.e. anumiti-karaNa.
>
> vyApti-jnAnatvena vyApti-jnAna means
> vyApti-jnAna-tva-avachchhinna-vyApti-jnAna is stated as anumiti-karaNa and
> not vishayatva-avachchhinna or pratiyogitA-avachchhinna etc. It has got
> nothing to do with agni.
>


Namaste Sudhanshu ji
vyApti-jnAna-tva-avachchhinna-vyApti-jnAna
is not clear. What does it mean in simpler elaborate language?

Also, X-avacchinna-Y implies there are also Z-avacchinna-Y and
W-avacchinna-Y

Here what are the avacchedakas possible?

For example, would a word/idea like "
ghaTa-jnAnatva-avacchinna-ghaTa-jnAnaM " make semantic sense?

Om




> vyApti-jnAna means a jnAna which has vyApti as the vishaya. ghaTa-jnAna
> means a jnAna which has ghaTa as the vishaya. Likewise.
>
> vyApti is separately defined as
> व्याप्तिश्चाशेषसाधनाश्रयाश्रितसाध्यसामानाधिकरण्यरूपा।
>
> A jnAna which has vyApti as vishaya is called vyApti-jnAna and that is
> stated in VP to be anumiti-karaNa. I don't understand what does agni have
> to do here.
>
> //The PanchapAdika and VivaraNa statements cited by you can now be seen. In
> my understanding उद्बुद्ध-व्याप्ति-संस्कार-सहित-लिङ्ग-ज्ञान
> (udbuddha-vyApti-saMskAra-sahita-li~Nga-j~nAna) practically translates to
> // **व्याप्तिज्ञानत्वेन व्याप्तिज्ञान** (vyAptij~nAnatvena vyAptij~nAna)
> (Translation ;; knowledge of invariable concomitance (vyapti) purely in its
> character as the knowledge of invariable concomitance)// . Terminology may
> be different.//
>
> As per my understanding, both are different like chalk and cheese.
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list