[Advaita-l] [advaitin] What is Samadhi?

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste.

I have not come across anywhere in Bhamati School or VivaraNa School that
Nirvikalpa Samadhi of the type advocated by Sri Patanjali Maharshi is
mandatory, or even recommended, for Realization as advanced by the Advaitic
School. If anyone has come across such declarations, please provide the
references.

Regards

On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 4:17 PM 'Bhaskar YR' via advaitin <
advaitin at googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Can you summarize what exactly you finally understand what is involved in
> Self Realization and is samadhi - required for it, etc.
>
>
>
> praNAms Sri Sada prabhuji
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> I reckon these two observations from Dennis prabhuji’s article would
> suffice to understand his perspective on samAdhi.  And being a follower of
> Sri paramArthAnandaji I hope you too would agree with him.
>
>
>
> //quote//
>
>  whereas what I would call ‘traditional’ Advaitins believe that Shankara’s
> teaching was that it is self-ignorance that obscures our understanding of
> the truth and that only self-knowledge can remove it. Thus, one of the key
> issues around the topic of neo-Vedanta is that of experience versus
> knowledge.
>
>
>
> But the most convincing argument for not including *nirvikalpa samAdhi* (in
> the Patanjali sense) as part of advaita is one I heard recently from Swami
> Paramarthananda. He argues that Patanjali, having written about this in his
> yoga sutras, and being regarded as the highest authority in the yoga
> philosophy, must obviously himself have experienced *nirvikalpa samAdhi*.
> Consequently, if its result is as has been argued by the neo-Vedantins,
> then Patanjali should be the greatest Advaitin ever. And yet his philosophy
> claims that there are many Atmans and that the world is real. So one has to
> conclude that his experience of *nirvikalpa samAdhi* led him to dualism
> and not non-dualism! Swami Paramarthananda’s last word on the subject is
> that we can happily be liberated without *nirvikalpa samAdhi*!
>
>
>
> //Unquote//
>
>
>
> If I am right not only bhAmati vehemently insisted the mandatory
> experience of ‘yOga school type samAdhi’ even in vivaraNa school too this
> non-dual practical experience advocated. Though as per this school the
> jnana of I am brahman devoid of any duality (nishprapancha etc. ) is the
> result of shAstra vihita vedAntavAkya shravaNa.  After the vAkya jnana
> dawns  the qualified jnAni ( he is mere qualified seeker of mOksha at this
> stage) has to continue to practice both the vedAnta vAkya shravaNa and
> vAkya janita jnana over and over again and over a period of time he would
> become aparOksha jnAni and he will be considered as custodian of direct
> intuitive knowledge.  But even for this aparOksha jnAni there is prArabdha
> and avidyA lesha hence he would continue to see the duality of world when
> he is not in asaMprajnAta samAdhi.  And for him, on certain occasions he
> would get the practical and ‘literal’ experience of Atmaikatvam.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "advaitin" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to advaitin+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/AM7PR06MB6581F87F0C6435D08C43D0F484422%40AM7PR06MB6581.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/AM7PR06MB6581F87F0C6435D08C43D0F484422%40AM7PR06MB6581.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>