[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Objection against bhAvarUpa-ajnAna on account of vishishTa-vaishishTya-avagAhi-jnAna in the form of "अहम् अज्ञः"

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Namaste Viswanath ji.

Pl check the image.

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/bwh7sza3mda32z4rw2exi/tempFileForShare_20241220-220950.jpg?rlkey=6v6kf8p3wo292v4306gul10c4&st=73u1e9w0&dl=0

Why can't the jnAna of दण्डत्व-विशिष्ट-दण्ड-वान् पुरुष:, which is what we
meant by jnAna of  दण्डी पुरुषः, be vishishTa-vaishishTya-avagAhi-jnAna?

This is not a vishishTa-vaishishTya-avagAhi-jnAna, but just
> vishishTa-jnana.
>

Even if we qualify danDa by danDatva dharma?

An example of a vishishTa-vaishishTya-avagAhi-jnAna would be गोपिका
> घटविषिष्टमक्षिकावती.
>

Certainly. Understood.

Regards.