[Advaita-l] My article for Shankara Jayanthi

[Venkatesh Murthy]

Namaste

If you don't tell the name of the Guru how will others know your Parampara?
AT least tell the Parampara like 'I am a disciple of SO and SO and he is
disciple of SO and SO and he is disciple of SO and SO'. Any person not
belonging to a Sampradaya is condemned by Adi Sankara. Guru Parampara is
important.

On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 9:49 AM KAMESWARARAO MULA <kamesh_ccmb at yahoo.co.in>
wrote:

> Dear Sir,
>                 Sastra Prohibits in taking the name of the guru. We have
> to analyze or interpret whether he is talking or sharing the correct
> knowledge or not. if guru wants he can take his disciple name once or twice
> in vyaharika purpose if he wishes to do but not the otherway.
>
> Swamy Yukteswar always insisted many people in not taking the names of any
> body more than twice while discussing the knowledge.
>
> One of the major disadvantage in taking the name is that it creates
> un-necessary havoc among the disciples  and ultimately it ends in making a
> forum with some money with out serving the actual objective of the
> relationship.
>
> I can explain and make convince anybody why we should not take the name of
> the guru.
>
> Sri Guru Padaravindarpana Mastu
> Kameswara
>
>
> On Friday, 10 May 2019 7:51 AM, Venkatesh Murthy via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
>
> Namaste Sri Sreenivasa Murthy Mahodaya
>
> You have kept on saying your Revered Guru taught you. Kindly tell us who is
> your Guru? What is his name? Where did he live and what is his life
> history?
>
>
> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 1:01 AM sreenivasa murthy via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> >  Dear Sri Nitin Sridhar,
> > The  vyavahara  perspective  itself  is  avidya  perspective.To  talk
> > about  Moksha  from  the  vyavahara  perspectiveitself  is  not  correct.
> > Because  vyavahara  perspective reinforces  the  wrong  notion  that  one
> > is  an  entity.Have  you examined  the  notion  "we are in the world"is
> > correct  or  wrong?
> > Are  YOU  in  the  world  or  the  world  is  within  YOU?
> > It  is  my  understanding  that  metaphysical  truth  has  to
> > be  taught  from  the  standpoint  of  the
> > Absolute. The sages have taught the paramArtha from the
> > paramArtha  stand-point.
> > To  know  paramArtha  is  to  be  paramArthaand  that  is  MOKSHA.Thus
> > taught  my  Revered  Guru.With respectful namaskars,Sreenivasa Murthy.
> > With respectful namaskars,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    On Thursday, 9 May, 2019, 7:11:21 pm IST, Nithin Sridhar <
> > sridhar.nithin at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Dear sir,
> > You are correct that Moksha is not a state or a realm to be attained.
> But,
> > it appears to be so so from a Vyavahara perspective. As long as we are in
> > the world and are bound by ignorance, the state of Moksha appears like a
> > goal (hence, considered Purushartha as well). I only mean in that sense.
> > Regards,Nithin
> > On Thu, May 9, 2019 at 6:54 PM sreenivasa murthy <
> narayana145 at yahoo.co.in>
> > wrote:
> >
> >  Dear Sri Nitin Sridhar,
> > You  write : " It  is  the  attainment  of  such  rare  and
> >  most  precious  Moksha,  which  the  Acharya  puts
> >  forth  as  the  phalashruti  of  this  text."Is  the word "attainment"
> > correct?  Where  can  one
> > attain  such  rare and  most  precious Moksha?Has  Moksha  to  be
> > attained?
> > Is  this  what  Sri  Shankara  means  or  it it  what  you  mean?What  is
> > Moksha  in  Sri Shankara's  own  words?He  says : nityatvAt  mOkShasya
> > sAdhakasvarUpAvyatirekAcca ||Kindly note the word
> > "sAdhakasvarUpAvyatirekAcca".What  does  it  mean?Does  it  mean  it  has
> > to  be  attained  newly?I  fear  your  statement  goes  against  the
> > above  teaching
> > of  Sri  Shankara  very  much  and  is  misleading  the  readers.
> > Moksha  is  prAptasya prAptiH.
> > With  respectful namaskars,
> > Sreenivasa Murthy
> >
> >
> >
> >    On Thursday, 9 May, 2019, 5:32:25 pm IST, Nithin Sridhar via Advaita-l
> > <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> >  Dear all,
> >
> > Here is my article for Shankara Jayanthi-
> >
> >
> http://www.indictoday.com/thoughts/the-garland-of-knowledge-a-glimpse-into-brahmajnanavalimala-of-adi-shankaracharya/
> >
> > It is a short English commentary on the opening verse of the wonderful
> text
> > of Brahmajnanavalimala of Adi Shankaracharya.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Nithin S
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nithin S
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> -Venkatesh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
>
>

-- 
Regards

-Venkatesh