[Advaita-l] Sleep, tamas and brahman

[S Jayanarayanan]

Kalyan via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
 
> If no adjective is used ***even at one place***, then logic demands
> that there is unqualified rejection of ignorance in deep sleep.
> There is no adjective used at 4.3,34, so it proves my point. 
> 
> ...
 
Reminds us of Dvaitin reasoning: "Vishnu is said to be Supreme in this particular instance, therefore Shiva cannot be accepted as the Supreme"!
 
<Clap> <Clap> <Clap> Wonderful logic!
 
Regards,
Kartik