[Advaita-l] "VEDA IS NO MORE veda "

[KALPANA MANSI]

Thank you, Sir, but for this example, it is not clear the particular
sentence " VEDA IS NO MORE VEDA". I am unable to understand because of
might be my lack of understanding. i will again repeat myself your
sentence. thank you  again

On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Venkatesh Murthy via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Namaste
>
> You know if you eat bad street side food you will become sick. A person X
> does not know this. He will eat street food not knowing how bad it is. When
> he is eating he will also like the taste very much. Another person Y has
> eaten it and has become sick. He has to take medicine. Another person Z has
> eaten it and he was sick but he took medicine regularly and became healthy.
> Now he is not taking medicine. It is unnecessary.
>
> In this example X is ignorant person. Medicine = Vedas.  He will not need
> medicine like Vedas. He happily eats till he becomes sick. Then he will
> take medicine.
>
> Z is the healthy person. He knowns he will not eat bad food again. He takes
> no medicine. He is happy without medicine.
>
> Y is the sick person.  He has to take medicine. After he becomes healthy he
> must stop medicine. It is of no use for healthy person.
>
> Vedas is like medicine for disease known as Bhava Roga. If you don't have
> that Roga you should not take medicine. Why should you take unnecessary
> medicine?
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 5:40 PM, KALPANA MANSI via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > Pranam to all.
> >                        I am reading a book entitled "Vedanta Sangraha of
> > Ramaraya Kavi "  the essential of Vedanta, which edited by prof., R.
> > Balasubramanian Sir & S. Revathy  Mam.  this book is mostly similar to
> Adi
> > Sankaracharya Philosophy,  for which/ he is known as Avinavb Sankara.In
> the
> > introduction Part, he discussed in the context of nature and work of
> Sruti,
> > where he discussed   " one who is ignorant of the truth need pramana, and
> > not one has already known the truth. to one who has realised
> Brahman-atman,
> > which is real (satyam), the Veda is no more Veda, as declared by the
> > Upanisad. " this sentence, I didn't understand please narrate it briefly.
> > Thank you
> > pranam to all.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> -Venkatesh
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>