[Advaita-l] Regarding the Pancharatra, Shankara is one with Purvamimamsa

[Bhaskar YR]

Having said that, whatever school accepts and propound this tAratammya in jnyAna at their core teaching; automatically stands out to be correct. Don't you think so? I am asking this question looking from outside of any traditional boundaries.


praNAms Sri Srinath Vedagarbha prabhuji
Hare Krishna

Yes, you are right prabhuji.  And this is the right and acceptable observation for both inside and outside of any tradition.  For that matter irrespective of any tradition and its teaching, jnana tAratamya in various human beings at various level is quite conspicuous so it is more of a common sense issue, as you know nobody goes to doctor and ask him to construct a house!! ☺ Hence, when it comes to vaidika jnana / vedAntArtha jnana,  in Advaita there is difference in jnAni-s like jnAnavida, jnAnavareeya, jnAnavidvarishTa etc.  like jeeva bheda in dvaita mukti yOga, samsAra yOgya and permanent Naraka yOgya jeeva-s ☺ But in paramArtha jnana there is no tAratamya it is ekam eva adviteeyaM.

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar

From: Srinath Vedagarbha [mailto:svedagarbha at gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 7:55 PM
To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
Cc: Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com>
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Regarding the Pancharatra, Shankara is one with Purvamimamsa

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Sri.Bhaskar rayare,

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:20 AM Bhaskar YR via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org<mailto:advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>> wrote:

"alpAksharamasandhigdaM sAravadvishvatO mukhaM, astObhamanavadyaM cha sUtraM sUtravidO viduH...purAna vachana about sUtra lakshaNa is really at the discouraging  level here :-)   bhagavatpAda, incarnation of bhagavAn shankara says something, rAmAnujAchArya, Adishesha avatAra, says something else and madhvAchArya, incarnation of mukhya prANa devarU sees something entirely new thing in the same adhikaraNa / sUtra...We the jignAsu-s, going by our traditional Acharya-s interpretation, thinking it is the final verdict of the sUtra and arguing with others :-) It's so amusing some times to witness the traditional war on siddhAnta among various schools of thought :-)

Just looking at all these outside the boundaries of any tradition.


Your observation is quite up to the mark!

This is the fact, no denial.  What does this fact indicates? Same texts evokes multiple knowledge in multiple preceptors. Qualitative duality is resounding at this core knowledge level.

Having said that, whatever school accepts and propound this tAratammya in jnyAna at their core teaching; automatically stands out to be correct. Don't you think so? I am asking this question looking from outside of any traditional boundaries.

/sv