[Advaita-l] Chanting Gayatri overseas

[D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ]

Does somebody 's approval disapproval
​of marrying outside hindu fold ​
make a difference?
Suppose one disapproves what can he do?

Puranas have already predicted
​that ​
in Kaliyuga
​
all the
​earlier ​
norms will be broken. They ha
​ve ​
said that this is *Yuga Dharma*.
​That means that *for this age this  is the dharma*.​ Why do we hanker for
Kritayuga dharma in Kali. Is it not wrong to do so.
Is there not a motive behind such a desire?  This I think is due to
mechanisms of vested interests

Every age has a dharma. That dharma evolves slowly in order to keep the
society at that time in order.
The modern human society is also slowly evolving its own dharma. The modern
Hindu society also will do the
same. I do not think that any of us can stop it.

Vidura has described the highest dharma as
"Do not do to others those things, when done by others pain your mind"
He said that this is the supreme dharma. Can there be any higher authority
for dharma.
than the incarnation of Yamadharmaraja himself.


regards,
Sarma.

On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Santosh Rao via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Yes, it seems many South Indian Brahmin families in the United States would
> gladly have their daughters marry, say, a white American google employee
> rather than a pious brahmana who works a regular job. For those who say
> dharma should be modified according to time, place, and circumstance, is
> this also acceptable? Where is the line drawn? Would acarya approve?
>
> Namaskara,
>
> Santosh
>
> On Oct 8, 2017 10:28 AM, "Ravi Chandrasekhara via Advaita-l" <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> Pranam,
>
> Long term effects of staying abroad is Devine in culture and language. An
> article in Undia Abroad says 30% of Hindus marry Christians. We see many SI
> Brahmins doing this. Hence Mlechcha samparka becomes Mlechcha Sangama.
>
> Ravi Chandrasekhara
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 8, 2017, at 00:58, Sujal Upadhyay via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > Pranams,
> >
> > Even Ādi Śankara has broken Āshrama dharma when he attended his mother's
> > cremation.
> >
> > Thank you Sri Subbu ji sharing sharing your thoughts in this and earlier
> > emails.
> >
> > A little off-topic: I humbly feel that we should not try to find
> perfection
> > in anybody. Except Iśvara no one else is perfect. People find faults in
> > Bhagavān Rāma also.
> >
> > Hari OM
> > Sujal
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 12:46 PM, V Subrahmanian via Advaita-l <
> > advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> >>> On Sun, Oct 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Kalyan <kalyan_kg at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Subbuji,
> >>>
> >>> I appreciate your liberal and practical outlook.
> >>>
> >>> But as far as crossing the ocean is concerned, what applies to any
> >>> brAhmaNa also applies to the Sringeri Acharya. So if there are "vibrant
> >>> Hindu communities with Vedic knowledge" in distant lands, what prevents
> >> the
> >>> AchArya from going there physically? Perhaps because he knows that it
> is
> >>> prohibited. If it is prohibited for him, same for others.
> >>>
> >>
> >> There is no compulsion for him to go there physically. For those who
> have
> >> gone there and settled, he does not refuse his blessings. His attitude
> in
> >> this has been already stated by me in this thread: So far the Jagadguru
> of
> >> this peetham has not gone abroad. We do not know what will be the case
> with
> >> the future pontiffs. That said, here is what he said, in a different
> >> context, about his predecessor Guru, Jagadguru Sri Abhinava Vidyatirtha
> as
> >> published in the book Yoga, Enlightenment and Perfection :
> >>
> >> //He was not in the least dogmatic. The ancients held that the earth is
> >> fixed while the modern scientists aver that it moves.
> >>
> >> purāṇamityeva na sādhu sarvaṁ
> >> na cāpi kāvyaṁ navamityavadyam ।
> >> santaḥ parīkṣyānyataradbhajante mūḍhaḥ
> >> parapratyayaneyabuddhiḥ ॥4 (Malavikāgnimitra I.2)
> >> (All that is ancient is not good nor is a work censurable because it is
> >> modern. The wise accept an alternative after examination; the
> >> unwise are guided by the beliefs of others.)
> >> In keeping with this statement of the pre-eminent poet Kālidāsa, His
> >> Holiness subscribed only to the position that the earth moves. He
> >> ignored, in this manner, the distinction of ancient and modern in
> numerous
> >> matters and gave weight only to that which was reasonable
> >> and accorded with evidence. Broadmindedness such as His was difficult to
> >> come by in anyone else. //
> >>
> >> And Jagadguru Chandrashekhara Bharati Swamiji, admittedly a very
> orthodox
> >> Sannyasin, 'encouraged his disciple (Jagadguru Sri Abhinava Vidyatirtha)
> to
> >> take a free and independent line of thinking in such matters in keeping
> >> with the need to cater to a changing a less orthodox society. For his
> part
> >> however, he was content with directly holding the views he had.' (cited
> >> from the book The Crest Jewel of Yogis, Vol I,p.109).
> >>
> >> So, there is no worth in asking 'why the Jagadguru does not travel
> >> abroad?'
> >>
> >> Swami Paramarthananda had said about 'personal habits/interests': In a
> >> spiritual retreat spanning a few days, every morning the participants
> would
> >> arrive at the dining hall in the morning for breakfast and beverage. A
> >> choice of Coffee, Tea, milk, etc. will be offered. Each one takes that
> >> which he is used to, is comfortable with, preference, etc. There is no
> >> censure of those who prefer coffee over milk. In fact if some of the
> >> beverages offered there were a taboo, they would not have been given as
> a
> >> choice.
> >>
> >> So, a person may not have objection to someone else travelling abroad
> but
> >> he may not be inclined to do so. Does not one have the freedom to hold a
> >> particular view?
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> So, your arguments don't really sound convincing.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Conviction arising from an argument is subjective.
> >>
> >> regards
> >> subbu
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> >> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >>
> >> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> >> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >>
> >> For assistance, contact:
> >> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>