[Advaita-l] Debunking Drishti-Srishti Vada and Eka Jiva Vada - part 1

[sreenivasa murthy]

Dear Sri Aditya Kumar,
You  write : "A Jnani is established in Brahman."Please permit me to slightly amend this sentence as follows :A Jnani is Brahman. brahmavit brahmaiva Bavati || 
Where is the question of being established in Brahman 
when he is Brahman / Atman itself?A mumukshu, when he realizes his intrinsic nature by shedding  the adventious one  the realization reveals that he was never an individual person, he is not an individual person even NOW, he will never be an indidividual person.
 
Thank you.With warm regards,Sreenivasa Murthy



 





      From: Aditya Kumar via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
 To: Venkatesh Murthy <vmurthy36 at gmail.com>; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
Cc: Aditya Kumar <kumaraditya22 at yahoo.com>
 Sent: Sunday, 16 July 2017 9:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Debunking Drishti-Srishti Vada and Eka Jiva Vada - part 1
   
Namaste,
A Jnani is established in Brahman. So for a Jnani, there is no creation at all. So it is Ajati - adau ante cha yennasti.....what was unreal in the beginning and end is unreal even now. So there was never a creation.
For a Mumukshu, this Anirvachaniya/Maya is inevitable. So no DSV here.

_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org