[Advaita-l] is this jagat mithyA ?? Sri SSS

[V Subrahmanian]

On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 2:31 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> In continuation to my previous post, the following passage from the
>> commentary by Sri SSS on BSB is also relevant.  It may be accessed at the
>> following link.
>>
>>
>>
>> << http://www.adhyatmaprakasha.org/php/bookreader/templates/
>> book.php?type=kannada&book_id=101A_2&pagenum=0001#page/16/mode/1up >>,
>>
>>
>>
>> Page 6, para 7, last few lines.  I am translating it here.
>>
>>
>>
>> << But Vedanta Sidhanta states that only atman is satya, rest is all
>> anruta/mithya/appearences perceived by people having wrong knowledge
>> >>
>>
>>
>>
>> << anAtma, which appears in some states subservient to Atman who is
>> jnAnaswarUpa, is asatya/mithyA/anruta. >>.
>>
>>
>>
>> << “  anruta is mithya “ does not mean that it does not appear at all.
>> It is not different from Atman. It does not have independent Existence.
>> Looked at carefully, it is Atman only. This is the meaning.  This should
>> always be borne in mind when encountering terms like mithyA/anruta etc.
>> >>.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>
> Namaste

Good to see the above. Yet, why do some people give the impression that SSS
did not subscribe to the idea 'jagat is mithyā'? Your explanation of his
words in the earlier post only shows that even his short article is
vyākhyāna-sāpekṣa. That standalone article can give an impression that I
got.  Could you kindly help me with the link to read his Mandukya karika
bhashya translation online, if it is uploaded in the site of the
kāryālaya?

Thanks
vs

>
>
> <#m_2447773517038480090_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>