[Advaita-l] asti bhAti priyaM in Drg-drsya viveka

[H S Chandramouli]

Sri *Br. Pranipata Chaitanya* Ji,


Pranams.


Reg your observation << One should understand the term bhAti as (anu)bhAti.

The bhAShya to the question - kiM u bhAti vibhAti vA and its answer - taM
eva bhAntaM anubhAti sarvaM (kaThA II.ii.14&15) will throw more light how -
idaM sarvaM tasya bhAsA vibhAti. >> ,


( anu ) bhAti would be appropriate when only the nAma rUpa aspects are
included in the reference to object/experience. However in the verse under
consideration , the bhAntaM aspect of taM is included as an aspect of the
object/experience itself by use of the term bhAti as one of the five
aspects. Hence in this context , in my opinion , use of the term bhAti is
appropriate and should not be understood as (anu)bhAti.


Respectfully submitted


Pranams and Regards


Chandramouli

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:16 PM, Br. Pranipata Chaitanya via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> >Then how does bhAti (in the verse) is explained? -- durga prasad
>
> One should understand the term bhAti as (anu)bhAti.
>
> The bhAShya to the question - kiM u bhAti vibhAti vA and its answer - taM
> eva bhAntaM anubhAti sarvaM (kaThA II.ii.14&15) will throw more light how -
> idaM sarvaM tasya bhAsA vibhAti.
>
> Hari Om! Pranipata
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>