[Advaita-l] Accepting Possibility of Error in Sastras

[Swami Sarvabhutananda]

*OM
The prerequisite for Sruti vicArA is SHRADDA in shAstram, shraddA in
SampradAyA,shraddA in GURU.
Logical analysis does not hold good in BRAHMA jnAnam.
Logical analysis cannot accept the pursuit!
I appreciate your effort in analysing shAstrA.
It is the paramparA and sampradAyam to help the student understand!
wishes and love.
Sw.SrvabhutAnandA
*
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Rajaram Venkataramani <
rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:

> In many religions, the scriptures are considered inerrant. We also consider
> the sastras to be the authroity. There is a lot of logic given to establish
> why sabda is pramana. There are stories such as Kumarila Bhatta's
> where complete acceptance of the authority of the sastras is
> reinforced. However, we see that Madhusudana says in Siddanthabindu (v 79),
> "The scriptures may state something that is merely the outcome of
> delusion". Here he admits that sastras can be erroneous. Though the
> tradition accepts the vedic model for creation, we see that there is a
> recognition of a contradictions there that is to be resolved through
> reason. For example, Gaudapada says (I.23), "In the matter of being
> created, whether from the already existent or from the non-existent also,
> the Sruti is equal, that is supporting both views. What is associated with
> or fortified with logical reasoning holds not the other".  The importance
> of reasoning is also stressed by Madhusudana, "The creation of names and
> forms by Him who does the triplication in BSB 2.4.20 in only an explanatory
> statement and cannot nullify quintuplication which is established by
> reasoning".  Sankara himself says, forget where, "Even a thousand sruti
> statements cannot make fire cold." In his bhashyas, we often see him quote
> sruti and then the opponent makes a logical counter to sruti. Sankara does
> not dismiss off the opponent saying that there cannot be a logical
> opposition because already the point has been established using sruti. He
> defends his position using logic.
>
> Are there conditions in which sastras can be accepted as erroneous? I am
> not talking about a presumption of error in sastras without evidence. But
> when there is concrete evidence based on pratyaksha and anumana that shows
> that the sastras are not correct, what is the valid traditional response?
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>



-- 
VISIT http://inteligentliving.blogspot.com/
WELCOME YOUR INTERACTION.
WISHES.