[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva of Vedas.

[Ramakrishna Upadrasta]

namaste Shri Raghav,


2011/9/14 Raghav Kumar <raghavkumar00 at gmail.com>:
> can never be falisified as being faulty; and this is accomplished without
> bringing any need for the idea of shraddhA anymore than shraddhA is required
> for visual perception etc., and we don't necessarily have to bring in the
> true fact and worthwhile fact certain exalted jIvanmukta-s (as per our
> faith) endorsed it etc.

This is a fairly accurate summary, my understanding of the situation as well.
Thanks for summarizing.

namaste
Ramakrishna