[Advaita-l] Shiva and Vishnu abheda in Shivananda lahari

[shyam Subramanian]

Any discussion of the supremacy of Shiva or Vishnu as representing the Supreme, or the relative merits of worship of Vinayaka, much less, only confirms the ipso fact supremacy of Mother Parashakti - in whose beguile and beginingless trance we labor, like a mother fancying to name her unborn, to assign names to That Unborn we acknowledge to be formless..alakshanam achintyam avyapadesyam ekatpratyayasaram!! To such a Mother who "bhramayati hari hara bhedabhAva aghatita ghatana patiyasi mAyA", my obeisance.
Hari OM
Shyam




On Jun 30, 2011, at 1:25 PM, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Namaste,
> 
> The puranas are classified as the Vishnava puranas, Shaiva Puranas, Brahma puranas and Shakta puranas. Vaisnava puranas show Vishnu as the Supreme being, Shaiva puranas show Shiva as the Supreme being , Brama puranas show Brahma as the Supreme being and the Shakta puranas show the Shakti as the Supreme being so that the Sect thinks its diety is the Supreme deity. It is only at a higher level it is taught that there is only one Brahman, call him Shiva, Vishnu  or Brahma or Shakti.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sunil KB
> 
> --- On Thu, 6/30/11, Ramakrishna Upadrasta <uramakrishna at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Ramakrishna Upadrasta <uramakrishna at gmail.com>
> Subject: [Advaita-l] Shiva and Vishnu abheda in Shivananda lahari
> To: "Advaita-L" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 10:55 AM
> 
> namaste,
> 
> One theme of Shivananda lahari is the supremacy of Shiva when compared
> to Vishnu, Brahma and others. In #4, 18, 23, 86, 99, Shri Adi Shankara
> refers to the brahma and viShNu.
> 
> haribrahmaadiinaamaapi nikaTabhaajaamasulabhaM #4
> 
> bhajante harimukhaaH: #18
> 
> vidhitvaM vishhNutvaM dishasi khalu tasyaaH phalamiti #23
> 
> pakshitvaM na cha vaa kiTitvamapi na praaptaM mayaa durlabham.h #86
> 
> haribrahmaaNau tau divi bhuvi charantau shramayutau #99
> 
> 
> #86,#99 above of the above references is the purANic episode of Brahma
> and Vishnu not being able to attain the Shiva, when He manifested in
> the form of a pillar of fire.
> 
> 
> But, the non-difference of shiva and viShnu, has been beautifully
> answered by Shri Adi Shankara in shivaananda-lahari #82 'baaNatvaM'.
> In that shloka, He describes that vishNu is 'puujyaatpuujyataraH sa
> eva hi na chet.h ko vaa tadaanyo.adhikaH' ("पूज्यात्पूज्यतरः स एव हि न
> चेत् को वा तदान्योऽधिकः'"). Note the use of:
> 
> 1. 'pUjyataraH', with a medium degree of use, and not the superlative
> use 'pUjyatamaH', meaning that the ones to be respected 'pUjyaat.h'
> are brahma and others, viShNu is to be more respected 'pUjyataraH',
> implying that the superlative use 'pUjyatamaH' has been reserved for
> shiva.
> 
> 2. "Vishnu is 'ko vaa adhikaH'". Contextually, this can be interpreted
> that He the best among the rest!  But, this can also mean that Vishnu
> is Highest with no one above Him meaning that He is the greatest among
> all.
> 
> So, the above shloka is a beautiful example to describe the supremacy
> of Shiva, while at the same time accepting that viShNu is the accepted
> supreme among the all. Meaning that there is a non-difference between
> them.
> 
> namaste
> Ramakrishna
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> 
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> 
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> 
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> 
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org