[Advaita-l] Is Brahman saguNa or nirguNa or aguNa?

[श्रीमल्ललितालालितः]

*श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <http://www.lalitaalaalitah.com>
lalitAlAlitaH <http://about.me/lalitaalaalitah/bio>*



On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:18, Br. Pranipata Chaitanya <
pranipata at hotmail.com> wrote:

> vedAntasAra of sadAnandaji, adhikArilakShaNa---
> adhikAri tu. . . kAmya niShiddha varjana puraHsaram . . . upAsanA
> anuShthAnena. . .
>

Sadananda is no one if he can't produce shAstra-pramANam.
And "upAsanAnuShThAnena" says that upAsana is useful for GYAna. It doesn't
support your view that it is done for concentration. And, It doesn't refute
the stand that upAsanA generates fruits other than that.


> murti to refer vigraha(arcAvatAramUrti); pratimA to omkAra; linga to
> saligrAma etc.
>

Any evidence ?