[Advaita-l] Conference on that Date of Adi Sankaracharya inOctober, 2002

[Sunil Bhattacharjya]

Yes, you have a point.

--- On Wed, 1/20/10, Michael Shepherd <michael at shepherd87.fsnet.co.uk> wrote:


From: Michael Shepherd <michael at shepherd87.fsnet.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Conference on that Date of Adi Sankaracharya inOctober, 2002
To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2010, 8:30 AM


The task of identification of the copper inscription may not be entirely at
a dead end. Copper can contain traces of 12 other related metals beside
itself; and copper neutron activation analysis can go some way to
identifying age (via smelting process empployed etc) and geographical
location (the admixture of those other elements). That is my understanding
of the current situation.

Michael

-----Original Message-----
From: advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
[mailto:advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org]On Behalf Of Anbu
sivam2
Sent: 20 January 2010 14:27
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Conference on that Date of Adi Sankaracharya
inOctober, 2002



Sharmaji, Radhe Krishna,

Thanks for you info.  I did a google search as suggested.  My understanding
is that carbon dating cannot be done on a metal such as copper.

Regards,

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:02 AM, Varadaraja Sharma <
rishyasrunga at rediffmail.com> wrote:

> Radhe Krishna,
>
> Anbe sivam, Radhe Krishna
>
> me too neither a metllurgist nor an ar­chaeologist.  Neverthless, whenever
> an archaeological artifact is unearthed, be it a fossil, even a wooden
tool,
> by a scientific method called carbon-14 dating, the age of artifact is
> determined.
> if you want more information as to accuracy of such determination of age
> etc., go to google search and would gather further information.
> regarding the copper inscription in question, leaving the facts as to when
> it was unearthed, who unearthed it, under whose posession is it now, it is
a
> matter of fact that it is alleged to be thousands of years old.
> If that being the case, through scientic methodology, if the age of
> artifact is determined, more information is known to the world at large.
>
> regards
> Radhe Krishna
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org





_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org