[Advaita-l] Re: svanubhavah and brahmAtma samsthitih

[Siva Senani Nori]

Thiru Amudan

You are right; deSa, kAla, and vastu are oft quoted paricchedas, whereas the three guNas are not usually referred to as paricchedas. I stand corrected and better informed. Thank you.

Regards
Senani

----- Original Message ----
From: Amuthan <aparyap at gmail.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2007 9:17:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Re: svanubhavah and brahmAtma samsthitih


On 3/15/07, Siva Senani Nori <sivasenani_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
([why?] Due to the falsity of those four on account of the saguNa
brahma being their object, and due to the non-presence of the form of
Brahman devoid of the three divisions {I think, satva-rajo-tama
guNas}in saguNa [brahman].
..............................

i think AchArya is referring to the absence of desha, kAla and vastu
parichCheda in nirguNa brahman when he uses the term
'parichChedatrayashUnyatva'.

--amudan.
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org


 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate 
in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367