[Advaita-l] Some rebellious remarks on Sri SSS

[savithri devaraj]

--- savithri devaraj <savithri_devaraj at yahoo.com>
wrote:

> 
> --- Ravisankar Mayavaram <abhayambika at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > 
> > * I do not find section 6 offensive or unprintable
> > and not even the
> > line  "Indeed none of his works are about the
> > philosophy of advaita,
> > but are oriented almost exclusively towards
> > contradicting previous
> > commentators of Sankaracarya."  or the assertion 
> > "that he is a
> > textual analyst and not a philosopher".  It is a
> > view of the author,
> > you are welcome contradict it factually by quoting
> > passages  from the
> > works of SSS . If I am not mistaken, even though
> > this is part of the
> > paper, it was not intended by Rama to be discussed
> > online ==> which
> > means you can reply, he may or may not respond.
> >
> 
> Namaste Ravi,
> 
> This is totally unfair. Why allow some guesswork and
> hearsay to be published on the list, and say it is
> out
> of bounds for list discussion? Yes, the quoted
> sentences are conjecture and opinion on the part of
> the author! Seems like the moderators of the list
> endorse such baseless opinions.
> It would seem best to get rid of sections that are
> out-of-bounds for discussion from the paper..Isn't
> it?
> 
> Regards,
> Savithri
> 


Oops, Sorry! I take back my comments on the
moderators, its my mistake. I thought the file was
under the files sections of the list. Sorry for not
verifying the URL.

Anyway, it seems strange that we are discussing only
some sections of a paper that is on someother site.

Regards,
Savithri


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com