[Advaita-l] Apaurusheyatva

[Ram Garib]

Thanks Jaldhar for your reply.

--- "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar at braincells.com> wrote:
 
> Needless to say we don't accept Madhva's
> interpretations as an 
> authoritative source of our tradition.  

I am not sure about this. As far as I understand, a
purvapaxin is refuted only on those issues where you
do not agree with him. As far as "apaurusheyatva"
issue is concerned, I do not know if any other school
of indian philosophy has anything better to offer than
madhwa.

With regards,
Ram Garib




		
__________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com