[Advaita-l] Advaita-l Digest, Vol 2, Issue 29

[Jay Nelamangala]

Dear Nagaarjuna,

>Second Sutra is describing Brahman as Creator, Destructor, etc
>and the first sootra is demanding that you make such an
>Ultimate Brahman as the object of your enquiry.

>The second sutra is not imposing any action on brahman. It is just passively stating that brahman is the cause. It does not mean that brahman is >being treated as an agent of action here. For example, when we say "fire cooks food" or "the sun illuminates the earth", we are not proposing that fire >and sun are active agents.

If you want to use the word Brahman in the sense of dvaita - use Parabrahman 
consistently.

If you want to use the same in the sense of advaita - use Brahman-S and
Brahman-N ,  so I can understand what you are saying more clearly.

Will you please re-write the above?.  So instead of Ultimate Brahman use Brahman-N.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </archives/advaita-l/attachments/20030613/639f5467/attachment.html>